G. de Wit

588 citations
19 papers · 527 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Polymer crystallization and properties 7
    • Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties 4
    • biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties 6

G. de Wit

19 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers

G. de Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 81
  • Biomaterials 198
  • Polymers and Plastics 152
  • Catalysis 40
  • Biomedical Engineering 223
Replace Michel Bortolussi with:
Michel Bortolussi France
Matthew R. Giles United Kingdom
Naoto Aoyagi Japan
Albert S. Matlack United States
Matthias Bühler Germany
Taketoshi Kito Japan
Zhiwei Guo United States
Guifu Si China
Raúl Porcar Spain
Anthony E. Rosamilia Italy
G. de Wit relative to Michel Bortolussi France Michel Bortolussi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Michel Bortolussi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. de Wit. The network helps show where G. de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside G. de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. de Wit Line = papers co-authored together G. de Wit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1979125
2 2008101
3 198161
4 200530
5 200528
6 197926
7 197825
8 200724
9 200522
10 200717
11 197516
12 200416
13 200510
14 20028
15 19845
16
Gedrag van glucose, fructose en verwante suikers in alkalisch milieu.
19795
17 19804
18 20063
19 20051

About G. de Wit

G. de Wit is a scholar working on Polymers and Plastics, Biomaterials, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Biomedical Engineering and Organic Chemistry, having authored 19 papers that have together received 527 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polymer crystallization and properties (7 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (6 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (5 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (4 papers), Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (4 papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (3 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (3 papers) and Enzyme Structure and Function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (81 citations), Biomaterials (198 citations), Polymers and Plastics (152 citations), Catalysis (40 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (223 citations). G. de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, China and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include A. P. G. Kieboom, H. van Bekkum, Christian Bailly, Cor E. Koning, Han Goossens, Robbert Duchateau, H. van Bekkum, R. Sablong, Daan S. van Es and Jacco van Haveren. Their work appears in journals such as Carbohydrate Research, The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Tetrahedron Letters, Journal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry and Macromolecules.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact