G. Crepy

592 citations
11 papers · 493 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

G. Crepy

10 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

G. Crepy
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Electrochemistry 103
  • Modeling and Simulation 61
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 37
  • Metals and Alloys 14
  • Condensed Matter Physics 58
Replace Dalimil Šnita with:
Dalimil Šnita Czechia
Chuhong Wang United States
Kevin T. Chu United States
Effendi Rusli United States
J. H. Kelley United States
Michele Riva Italy
M. Megdiche Tunisia
C. S. Praveen India
A.P. Lehnen United States
Kyu‐Hwan Lee South Korea
G. Crepy relative to Dalimil Šnita Czechia Dalimil Šnita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×61×
Dalimil Šnita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Crepy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Crepy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Crepy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Crepy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Crepy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Crepy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Crepy. The network helps show where G. Crepy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside G. Crepy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Crepy Line = papers co-authored together G. Crepy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1983304
2 197872
3 197434
4 199232
5 198524
6 198612
7 19898
8
Advanced electrolysis in alkaline solution
19774
9
Improvements in electrolysis technology in alkaline solution
19792
10 19921
11 20020

About G. Crepy

G. Crepy is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Automotive Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Electrochemistry and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, having authored 11 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (4 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (4 papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (2 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (2 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (2 papers), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (1 paper), Conducting polymers and applications (1 paper) and Material Dynamics and Properties (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (103 citations), Modeling and Simulation (61 citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (37 citations), Metals and Alloys (14 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (58 citations). G. Crepy has collaborated with scholars based in France and United States. Frequent co-authors include A.J. Appleby, C. Lamy, S. Maximovitch, Alain Le Méhauté, C. Belin, A. de Guibert, Paula Sánchez, Thierry Hamaide, Alain Guyot and L. Früchter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Materials Science, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Solid State Ionics, Polymer Bulletin and Journal of The Electrochemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact