G. Cavinato

77 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

G. Cavinato
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 428
  • Inorganic Chemistry 612
  • Organic Chemistry 998
  • Catalysis 147
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 227
Replace Yujie Wang with:
Yujie Wang China
Owen John Curnow New Zealand
Cheng‐Ling Pan China
Youngjo Kim South Korea
Alberto Ramos Spain
Lapo Luconi Italy
Xiaoyong Du China
Qiming Bing China
Ruihua Cheng China
Xueqin Cao China
G. Cavinato relative to Yujie Wang China Yujie Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Yujie Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Cavinato

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Cavinato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Cavinato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Cavinato more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Cavinato

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Cavinato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Cavinato. The network helps show where G. Cavinato may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Cavinato, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Cavinato Line = papers co-authored together G. Cavinato links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019224
2 199085
3 201369
4 200159
5 201358
6 198252
7 200448
8 199347
9 201641
10 201441
11 198140
12 199333
13 198332
14 198231
15 198130
16 198529
17 199426
18 198226
19 200326
20 200826

About G. Cavinato

G. Cavinato is a scholar working on Process Chemistry and Technology, Inorganic Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Oncology and Catalysis, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (37 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (30 papers), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (25 papers), Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (13 papers), Fuel Cells and Related Materials (9 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (8 papers), Advanced battery technologies research (7 papers) and Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (428 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (612 citations), Organic Chemistry (998 citations), Catalysis (147 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (227 citations). G. Cavinato has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Luana Toniolo, Luigi Toniolo, Andrea Vavasori, Vito Di Noto, Keti Vezzù, Enrico Negro, Gioele Pagot, Angeloclaudio Nale, Yannick Bang and Chuanyu Sun. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, Inorganica Chimica Acta, Electrochimica Acta, Chemical Vapor Deposition and Applied Catalysis A General.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact