Frederick Moore

883 citations
14 papers · 629 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick Moore

13 papers receiving 610 citations

Peers

Frederick Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 254
  • Epidemiology 237
  • Infectious Diseases 131
  • Animal Science and Zoology 26
  • Equine 4
Replace Jessica Haining with:
Jessica Haining Australia
Peter A. Buck Canada
Chester D. McDowell United States
Shakila Banu Bangladesh
Dillon S. McBride United States
Kimberly B. Hummel United States
Masaru Kuwayama Japan
Ariel Vina-Rodrı́guez Cuba
Estella Moffat Canada
Claire Mack Mugasa Uganda
Frederick Moore relative to Jessica Haining Australia Jessica Haining's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Jessica Haining · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Moore. The network helps show where Frederick Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Moore Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2010176
2 2021115
3 201095
4 201664
5 201362
6 202128
7 202027
8 201125
9 201812
10 20188
11 20227
12 20206
13 20204
14 20140

About Frederick Moore

Frederick Moore is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Animal Science and Zoology and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 14 papers that have together received 629 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mosquito-borne diseases and control (6 papers), Virology and Viral Diseases (3 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (2 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (1 paper) and Animal Virus Infections Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (254 citations), Epidemiology (237 citations), Infectious Diseases (131 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (26 citations) and Equine (4 citations). Frederick Moore has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Carmel T. Taylor, Hume Ernest Field, Gregory Allan Smith, Andrew F. van den Hurk, Elliott Geoffrey Playford, Brad McCall, Ina Smith, Jamie McMahon, Peter R. Moore and Scott A. Ritchie. Their work appears in journals such as Viruses, Emerging infectious diseases, Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, Pathology and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact