Frederick J. Fuller

2.4k citations
63 papers · 2.0k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick J. Fuller

63 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Frederick J. Fuller
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Virology 364
  • Infectious Diseases 802
  • Animal Science and Zoology 443
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 416
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 393
Replace Ludwig Haas with:
Ludwig Haas Germany
O.‐R. Kaaden Germany
Gholamreza Darai Germany
Carmen M. Ruiz-Jarabo Spain
AD Hyatt Australia
Ellen W. Collisson United States
P.-P. Pastoret Belgium
G. Darai Germany
William G. Dundon Austria
Frederick J. Fuller relative to Ludwig Haas Germany Ludwig Haas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Ludwig Haas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick J. Fuller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick J. Fuller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick J. Fuller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick J. Fuller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick J. Fuller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick J. Fuller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick J. Fuller. The network helps show where Frederick J. Fuller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick J. Fuller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick J. Fuller Line = papers co-authored together Frederick J. Fuller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015119
2 1992102
3 199390
4 199489
5 198688
6 198387
7 198283
8 199182
9 199562
10 200762
11 199462
12 200056
13 198356
14 198854
15 199253
16 199951
17 198248
18 201538
19 198336
20 198734

About Frederick J. Fuller

Frederick J. Fuller is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology and Genetics, having authored 63 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (20 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (18 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (17 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (16 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (16 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (11 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (9 papers) and Virology and Viral Diseases (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (364 citations), Infectious Diseases (802 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (443 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (416 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (393 citations). Frederick J. Fuller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Stephanie T. Perry, D. H. L. Bishop, Debra C. Sellon, Susan Payne, Philip I. Marcus, L Coggins, Ν. James MacLachlan, M T Flaherty, James S. Guy and Travis C. McGuire. Their work appears in journals such as Virology, Journal of Virology, Journal of General Virology, Avian Diseases and Virus Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact