Frederick Ehrlich

21 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

Frederick Ehrlich
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Rehabilitation 84
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 54
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 157
  • Clinical Psychology 146
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 17
Replace L. Winter with:
L. Winter United States
Sandy Schinfeld United States
Josef Sternberg United States
Rebecca Vivrette United States
Kathleen T. Lucke United States
Susan S. Merrill United States
Rachel L. Delavan United States
Katsuko Kanagawa Japan
Estelle Martin Switzerland
Seyedeh Ameneh Motalebi Iran
Frederick Ehrlich relative to L. Winter United States L. Winter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
L. Winter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Ehrlich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Ehrlich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Ehrlich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Ehrlich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Ehrlich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Ehrlich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Ehrlich. The network helps show where Frederick Ehrlich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Ehrlich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Ehrlich Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Ehrlich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992227
2 200366
3 200453
4 199649
5 200934
6 199215
7 19968
8 19737
9 20016
10 19796
11
Stress in carers of the elderly. A controlled study of patients attending a Sydney family medical practice.
19995
12 19964
13 20004
14 19992
15 19672
16 19722
17 19942
18 19912
19 20101
20 19941

About Frederick Ehrlich

Frederick Ehrlich is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Psychiatry and Mental health and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 501 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (2 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (84 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (54 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (157 citations), Clinical Psychology (146 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (17 citations). Frederick Ehrlich has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Brian Draper, Christopher J. Poulos, Roslyn G. Poulos, Andrew Cole, Stephen R. Lord, Georgina Luscombe, Henry Brodaty, Leonard Solomon and Eric A. J. Hoste. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Australian Occupational Therapy Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact