Frederick A. Streams

761 citations
29 papers · 672 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick A. Streams

29 papers receiving 545 citations

Peers

Frederick A. Streams
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Insect Science 325
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 145
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 223
  • Ecology 226
  • Ecological Modeling 26
Replace Tonia Robb with:
Tonia Robb Canada
Jon Martin Australia
Jens Bast Switzerland
J. M. Cullen Australia
Julia Reger United Kingdom
Andrés Pérez‐Figueroa Spain
Dorothy Prowell Pashley United States
W. J. Turnock Canada
Paula M. Mackie Canada
Jürgen Kusch Germany
Frederick A. Streams relative to Tonia Robb Canada Tonia Robb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Tonia Robb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick A. Streams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick A. Streams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick A. Streams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick A. Streams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick A. Streams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick A. Streams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick A. Streams. The network helps show where Frederick A. Streams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Frederick A. Streams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick A. Streams Line = papers co-authored together Frederick A. Streams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198499
2 196993
3 199455
4 196949
5 197334
6 198632
7 198725
8 198725
9 196824
10 196823
11 197023
12 196121
13 199220
14 198219
15 197115
16 196815
17 197114
18 199212
19 198212
20 196711

About Frederick A. Streams

Frederick A. Streams is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 29 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (14 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (7 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (6 papers), Hemiptera Insect Studies (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (5 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (4 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (325 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (145 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (223 citations), Ecology (226 citations) and Ecological Modeling (26 citations). Frederick A. Streams has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony J. Nappi, Leslie S. Greenberg, Mohammad Shahjahan, Donald Bennett, David Pimentel, John G. Stoffolano, David Mayke da Silva Pimentel, Roger W. Fuester, Carl W. Schaefer and Richard Ashley. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the Entomological Society of America, Journal of Economic Entomology, Environmental Entomology, Journal of Invertebrate Pathology and Oecologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact