Frédéric Neyrat

444 citations
49 papers · 143 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Frédéric Neyrat

32 papers receiving 112 citations

Peers

Frédéric Neyrat
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Geography, Planning and Development 34
  • Cultural Studies 28
  • Urban Studies 11
  • Sociology and Political Science 69
  • Literature and Literary Theory 17
Replace Aloïs Riegl with:
Aloïs Riegl
Stephen Rust United States
Eileen A. Joy United States
Michael Dylan Foster United States
Evi Ziegler c o EDV Fotowerk Huber
Liz Wells United Kingdom
Tim Barringer United States
David Joselit United States
Michel Collot France
Cathy Turner United Kingdom
Frédéric Neyrat relative to Aloïs Riegl Aloïs Riegl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Aloïs Riegl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Neyrat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Neyrat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Neyrat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Neyrat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Neyrat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Neyrat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Neyrat. The network helps show where Frédéric Neyrat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Neyrat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Neyrat Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Neyrat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201730
2 201823
3 200613
4 20188
5 20035
6 20175
7 20174
8 20154
9 20114
10 20103
11
Clinamen : flux, absolu et loi spirale
20113
12 20203
13 20083
14 20133
15 20163
16
Le communisme existentiel de Jean-Luc Nancy
20132
17 20162
18 20102
19 20152
20 20082

About Frédéric Neyrat

Frédéric Neyrat is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 49 papers that have together received 143 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education, sociology, and vocational training (6 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (5 papers), Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (2 papers), Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (2 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (2 papers), Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (2 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers) and Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (34 citations), Cultural Studies (28 citations), Urban Studies (11 citations), Sociology and Political Science (69 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (17 citations). Frédéric Neyrat has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Benin. Frequent co-authors include Donna Haraway, Karen Barad, Yves Citton, Franco Berardi, Isabelle Stengers, Virginie Maris, Steven Shaviro and Yann Moulier-Boutang. Their work appears in journals such as Multitudes, Angelaki, Cultural Geographies, French Politics and South Atlantic Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact