Frederic H. Gerber

430 citations
7 papers · 302 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Frederic H. Gerber

7 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

Frederic H. Gerber
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 123
  • Occupational Therapy 44
  • Internal Medicine 8
  • Biomedical Engineering 100
  • Surgery 88
Replace J N Keeman with:
J N Keeman Netherlands
Steven J. Baccei United States
Antoinette Kenny United Kingdom
Giuseppe Tarulli Canada
Emine Çalışkan Türkiye
M. B. Hermel United States
Bartosz Mruk Poland
Janet E. Burns United Kingdom
E J Bendavid United States
Andrew J. Krainik United States
Frederic H. Gerber relative to J N Keeman Netherlands J N Keeman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
J N Keeman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederic H. Gerber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic H. Gerber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic H. Gerber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic H. Gerber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic H. Gerber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic H. Gerber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic H. Gerber. The network helps show where Frederic H. Gerber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Frederic H. Gerber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederic H. Gerber Line = papers co-authored together Frederic H. Gerber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 1983206
2 197755
3
Oblique views in lung perfusion scanning: clinical utility and limitations.
197717
4 198210
5
Gallium-67 citrate imaging of pyomyositis.
19818
6
Should single-phase radionuclide bone imaging be used in suspected osteomyelitis?
19844
7 19822

About Frederic H. Gerber

Frederic H. Gerber is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Biomedical Engineering and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 7 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (1 paper), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (1 paper), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (1 paper), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (123 citations), Occupational Therapy (44 citations), Internal Medicine (8 citations), Biomedical Engineering (100 citations) and Surgery (88 citations). Frederic H. Gerber has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include E D Silverman, Catherine de Metz, Peter T. Kirchner, William J. Fouty, James J. Goodreau, Peter E. Nielsen, John F. Healy, John P. Sands, Thomas G. Rudd and Wil B. Nelp. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, New England Journal of Medicine, Radiology, PubMed and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact