Frederic E. Mohs

55 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Frederic E. Mohs
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Dermatology 1.1k
  • Epidemiology 1.7k
  • Small Animals 287
  • Oncology 827
  • Surgery 675
Replace Stephen N. Snow with:
Stephen N. Snow United States
Purnima Sau United States
Ming H. Jih United States
Boštjan Luzar Slovenia
Jee‐Ho Choi South Korea
Kee‐Chan Moon South Korea
Elizabeth Magill Billingsley United States
Gary R. Kantor United States
Nobuko Tabata Japan
Melissa Peck Piliang United States
Frederic E. Mohs relative to Stephen N. Snow United States Stephen N. Snow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Stephen N. Snow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederic E. Mohs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic E. Mohs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic E. Mohs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic E. Mohs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic E. Mohs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic E. Mohs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic E. Mohs. The network helps show where Frederic E. Mohs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Frederic E. Mohs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederic E. Mohs Line = papers co-authored together Frederic E. Mohs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991295
2 1994185
3 1986172
4
Chemosurgery: Microscopically controlled surgery for skin cancer
1978161
5 1952160
6 1992117
7 1979104
8 1978102
9 1989101
10
Chemosurgery for skin cancer: fixed tissue and fresh tissue techniques.
197699
11 197687
12 198587
13 197771
14 197966
15 197864
16 199451
17 198150
18 198849
19 198048
20 197842

About Frederic E. Mohs

Frederic E. Mohs is a scholar working on Dermatology, Oncology, Epidemiology, Small Animals and Surgery, having authored 57 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (29 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (23 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (19 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (9 papers), Ear and Head Tumors (7 papers), Infectious Diseases and Mycology (6 papers), Nail Diseases and Treatments (4 papers) and Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (1.1k citations), Epidemiology (1.7k citations), Small Animals (287 citations), Oncology (827 citations) and Surgery (675 citations). Frederic E. Mohs has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Stephen N. Snow, Jacob S. Lo, Paul O. Larson, William J. Sahl, George J. Hruza, George T. Reizner, Jan M. Feyzi, THOMAS F. C. S. WARNER, John A. Zitelli and Edward M. Messing. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Dermatologic Clinics, Dermatologic Surgery and Clinics in Plastic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact