Frédéric Beaulieu

2.4k citations
37 papers · 582 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Frédéric Beaulieu

33 papers receiving 559 citations

Peers

Frédéric Beaulieu
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Insect Science 419
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 448
  • Parasitology 58
  • Ecology 132
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 55
Replace Owen D. Seeman with:
Owen D. Seeman Australia
María L. Moraza Spain
Ziemowit Olszanowski Poland
Juan A. Schnack Argentina
Jerzy Błoszyk Poland
Peter Mašán Slovakia
R. Ochoa United States
Grzegorz Gabryś Poland
Juan Carlos Iturrondobeitia Bilbao Spain
Peter Manko Slovakia
Frédéric Beaulieu relative to Owen D. Seeman Australia Owen D. Seeman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Owen D. Seeman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Beaulieu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Beaulieu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Beaulieu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Beaulieu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Beaulieu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Beaulieu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Beaulieu. The network helps show where Frédéric Beaulieu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Beaulieu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Beaulieu Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Beaulieu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201153
2 200950
3 200743
4 201443
5 201037
6 200835
7 201233
8 201826
9 201225
10 201323
11 200721
12 201221
13 201420
14 200819
15 202215
16 200915
17 200613
18 201210
19 201910
20 20169

About Frédéric Beaulieu

Frédéric Beaulieu is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Parasitology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 582 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (27 papers), Study of Mite Species (25 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (14 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers) and Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (419 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (448 citations), Parasitology (58 citations), Ecology (132 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (55 citations). Frédéric Beaulieu has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew R. Weeks, D. E. Walter, Wayne Knee, Mark R. Forbes, Gilberto J. de Morães, Jennifer J. Beard, Hans Klompen, H. C. Proctor, R. L. Kitching and Jeffrey H. Skevington. Their work appears in journals such as Zootaxa, Experimental and Applied Acarology, ZooKeys, Acarologia and Systematic and Applied Acarology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact