Fred Fejes
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Communication top 5%
- Media Studies and Communication
- Social Media and Politics
Papers in
-
- Media, Gender, and Advertising 5
- Gender, Feminism, and Media 4
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Linda Steiner (1 shared paper)Jennifer Daryl Slack (1 shared paper)Rita J. Simon (1 shared paper)Thomas K. Nakayama (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Critical Studies in Media Communication (2 papers)Journal of Homosexuality (2 papers)Media Culture & Society (2 papers)Journal of American History (2 papers)Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGuatemala
In The Last Decade
Fred Fejes
19 papers receiving 325 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Gender Studies 176
- Communication 127
- Medical Terminology 1
- Cultural Studies 35
- Urban Studies 21
Countries citing papers authored by Fred Fejes
This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Fejes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Fejes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Fejes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Fejes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Fejes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Fejes. The network helps show where Fred Fejes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Fred Fejes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 108 | |
| 2 | 1981 | 65 | |
| 3 | The Ideology of the Information Age | 1987 | 39 |
| 4 | 1984 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 31 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 23 | |
| 8 | 1980 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 13 | |
| 11 | Images of Men in Media Research. | 1989 | 9 |
| 12 | 1989 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1980 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 19 | A Competing Ideology for the Information Age | 1987 | 1 |
| 20 | 2000 | 1 |
About Fred Fejes
Fred Fejes is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media, Gender, and Advertising (5 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers), Media Studies and Communication (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (2 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers) and Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (176 citations), Communication (127 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Cultural Studies (35 citations) and Urban Studies (21 citations). Fred Fejes has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Guatemala. Frequent co-authors include Linda Steiner, Jennifer Daryl Slack, Rita J. Simon and Thomas K. Nakayama. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Studies in Media Communication, Journal of Homosexuality, Media Culture & Society, Journal of American History and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.