Francesca Pilo’

408 citations
25 papers · 247 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Francesca Pilo’

22 papers receiving 226 citations

Peers

Francesca Pilo’
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Urban Studies 104
  • Political Science and International Relations 117
  • Pollution 47
  • Geography, Planning and Development 18
  • Development 6
Replace Gediminas Lesutis with:
Gediminas Lesutis Netherlands
Kareem Buyana Uganda
Cyria Emelianoff France
Eberhard Rothfuß Germany
Verna Nel South Africa
David Ehrhardt Netherlands
Anna Badyina United Kingdom
John Howe United Kingdom
Jonathan Halpern United States
Sunila S. Kale United States
Francesca Pilo’ relative to Gediminas Lesutis Netherlands Gediminas Lesutis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Gediminas Lesutis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Francesca Pilo’

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Francesca Pilo’'s research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesca Pilo’ with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesca Pilo’ more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Francesca Pilo’

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesca Pilo’. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesca Pilo’. The network helps show where Francesca Pilo’ may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Francesca Pilo’, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Francesca Pilo’ Line = papers co-authored together Francesca Pilo’ links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202135
2 201732
3 202332
4 201927
5 202021
6 201615
7 202112
8 202011
9 20229
10 20239
11 20189
12 20237
13 20226
14 20235
15 20235
16 20233
17 20252
18 20252
19 20231
20 20231

About Francesca Pilo’

Francesca Pilo’ is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies, Geography, Planning and Development, Sociology and Political Science and Pollution, having authored 25 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Water Governance and Infrastructure (15 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (12 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (8 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (6 papers), Energy and Environment Impacts (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (2 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 papers) and Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (104 citations), Political Science and International Relations (117 citations), Pollution (47 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (18 citations) and Development (6 citations). Francesca Pilo’ has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, France and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jochen Monstadt, Rivke Jaffe, Kei Otsuki, Fedor A. Dokshin, Christopher M. Rea, Sarah Burch, Vanesa Castán Broto, Marianne Morange, Christof Brandtner and Patricia Romero‐Lankao. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Urban Studies, City & Society, Urban Research & Practice and Environment and Planning C Politics and Space.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact