Fleming Lure

785 citations
47 papers · 516 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Fleming Lure

44 papers receiving 499 citations

Peers

Fleming Lure
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Health Informatics 23
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 183
  • Health Information Management 19
  • Neurology 33
  • Media Technology 36
Replace Tahir Hamid with:
Tahir Hamid Qatar
Demin Yao China
Yunbi Liu China
Tasmi Tamanna Bangladesh
Bejoy Abraham India
Jinyu Cong China
Parisa Gifani Iran
Dzhoshkun I. Shakir United Kingdom
John Guttag United States
John Gibson United States
Fleming Lure relative to Tahir Hamid Qatar Tahir Hamid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tahir Hamid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fleming Lure

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fleming Lure's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fleming Lure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fleming Lure more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fleming Lure

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fleming Lure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fleming Lure. The network helps show where Fleming Lure may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fleming Lure, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fleming Lure Line = papers co-authored together Fleming Lure links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018108
2 202043
3 201537
4 201429
5 202024
6 202023
7 202222
8 199622
9 202317
10 200216
11 199815
12 202315
13 202315
14 200212
15 200111
16 20119
17 20258
18 20207
19 20237
20 20017

About Fleming Lure

Fleming Lure is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Artificial Intelligence, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Infectious Diseases, having authored 47 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in cancer detection (11 papers), COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (10 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (9 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (5 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (3 papers) and COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (23 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (183 citations), Health Information Management (19 citations), Neurology (33 citations) and Media Technology (36 citations). Fleming Lure has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Teresa Wu, Jing Li, Kewei Chen, David Weidman, Xiaonan Liu, Stefan Jaeger, Yibo Lu, Lin Guo, Pu-Xuan Lu and Bin Zheng. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, Journal of Endodontics, Medical Physics and Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact