Flávio E. Nácul

661 citations
18 papers · 307 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Flávio E. Nácul

17 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

Flávio E. Nácul
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 51
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 68
  • Neurology 36
  • Epidemiology 75
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 39
Replace Vis Niranjan with:
Vis Niranjan United States
P. Sporn Austria
Theresa Human United States
Ilya Kagan Israel
K. Dietrich United States
Svenerik Andréasson Sweden
Deborah White United States
W.G. Looijaard Netherlands
Drew Long United States
Marco Zanello Italy
Flávio E. Nácul relative to Vis Niranjan United States Vis Niranjan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Vis Niranjan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Flávio E. Nácul

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Flávio E. Nácul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Flávio E. Nácul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Flávio E. Nácul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Flávio E. Nácul

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Flávio E. Nácul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Flávio E. Nácul. The network helps show where Flávio E. Nácul may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Flávio E. Nácul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Flávio E. Nácul Line = papers co-authored together Flávio E. Nácul links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 202067
2 200867
3 201057
4 201023
5 200214
6 200813
7 200611
8 202210
9 200410
10 201610
11 20207
12 20205
13 20214
14 20043
15 20122
16 20142
17 20042
18
Delirium em pacientes críticos: [revisão]
20060

About Flávio E. Nácul

Flávio E. Nácul is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (2 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (51 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (68 citations), Neurology (36 citations), Epidemiology (75 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (39 citations). Flávio E. Nácul has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Frank M. Brunkhorst, Konrad Reinhart, Yasser Sakr, Kathleen Mudie, Luís Nacul, Hazel M. Dockrell, Jacqueline M. Cliff, Eliana Lacerda, Shennae O’Boyle and Taane G. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, CHEST Journal, Burns, Journal of Critical Care and Critical Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact