Fernando E. Silva
Impact in
- Surgery top 10%
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
- Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
- Surgical Simulation and Training
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Papers in
- Surgery 7
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 4
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 3
- Surgical Simulation and Training 1
- Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects 1
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 1
- Head and Neck Surgical Oncology 1
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 2
- Co-authors
- Lawrence G. Lenke (5 shared papers)James P. Chandler (2 shared papers)H. Hunt Batjer (1 shared paper)Edward Duckworth (1 shared paper)Dharmesh Patel (1 shared paper)Saumyajit Basu (1 shared paper)Ronald A. Lehman (1 shared paper)Tsung-Hsi Tu (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Spine Deformity (2 papers)Neurosurgical FOCUS (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)Elsevier eBooks (1 paper)Surgical Neurology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Fernando E. Silva
7 papers receiving 299 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Surgery 259
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 102
- Otorhinolaryngology 2
- Epidemiology 12
- Biochemistry 2
Countries citing papers authored by Fernando E. Silva
This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando E. Silva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando E. Silva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando E. Silva more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando E. Silva
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando E. Silva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando E. Silva. The network helps show where Fernando E. Silva may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Fernando E. Silva, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 272 | |
| 2 | Extended transbasal approach to skull base tumors. Technical nuances and review of the literature. | 2005 | 15 |
| 3 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 1 |
About Fernando E. Silva
Fernando E. Silva is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Genetics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 7 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper), Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects (1 paper), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (1 paper) and Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (259 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (102 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (2 citations), Epidemiology (12 citations) and Biochemistry (2 citations). Fernando E. Silva has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence G. Lenke, James P. Chandler, H. Hunt Batjer, Edward Duckworth, Dharmesh Patel, Saumyajit Basu, Ronald A. Lehman, Tsung-Hsi Tu, Michael Y. Wang and John E. Ziewacz. Their work appears in journals such as Spine Deformity, Neurosurgical FOCUS, PubMed, Elsevier eBooks and Surgical Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.