Ferdinand E E Van Der Does
Impact in
-
- Diabetes Management and Education
- Diabetes Management and Research
- Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Diabetes Treatment and Management
Papers in
-
- Diabetes Management and Education 3
-
- Chronic Disease Management Strategies 1
- Co-authors
- Robert J. Heine (4 shared papers)L.M. Bouter (3 shared papers)Pieter J. Kostense (2 shared papers)Frank J. Snoek (2 shared papers)P.A. Grootenhuis (2 shared papers)J. N. D. de Neeling (2 shared papers)Giel Nijpels (2 shared papers)Joost Dekker (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Diabetes Care (2 papers)Diabetologia (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)Bohn Stafleu van Loghum eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesVietnam
In The Last Decade
Ferdinand E E Van Der Does
5 papers receiving 373 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 226
- Pharmacy 10
- Family Practice 3
- Epidemiology 45
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 4
Countries citing papers authored by Ferdinand E E Van Der Does
This map shows the geographic impact of Ferdinand E E Van Der Does's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ferdinand E E Van Der Does with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ferdinand E E Van Der Does more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ferdinand E E Van Der Does
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ferdinand E E Van Der Does. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ferdinand E E Van Der Does. The network helps show where Ferdinand E E Van Der Does may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Ferdinand E E Van Der Does, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 226 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 70 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 60 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 35 | |
| 5 | Improvement of glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: favourable changes in blood pressure, total cholesterol and triglycerides, but not in HDL cholesterol, fibrinogen, Von Willebrand factor and (pro)insulin. | 2003 | 15 |
About Ferdinand E E Van Der Does
Ferdinand E E Van Der Does is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 5 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Education (3 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (226 citations), Pharmacy (10 citations), Family Practice (3 citations), Epidemiology (45 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (4 citations). Ferdinand E E Van Der Does has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Heine, L.M. Bouter, Pieter J. Kostense, Frank J. Snoek, P.A. Grootenhuis, J. N. D. de Neeling, Giel Nijpels, Joost Dekker, Ronald P. Stolk and D. E. Grobbee. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetes Care, Diabetologia, PubMed and Bohn Stafleu van Loghum eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.