Feng-Li Lin

10.6k citations
70 papers · 849 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Feng-Li Lin

66 papers receiving 840 citations

Peers

Feng-Li Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 565
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 501
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 191
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 292
  • Condensed Matter Physics 82
Replace Brando Bellazzini with:
Brando Bellazzini Italy
Behrouz Mirza Iran
R. Loganayagam India
Run-Qiu Yang China
Zhenbin Yang United States
Paolo Glorioso United States
Chao Niu China
Matthew M. Roberts United States
Hosein Mohammadzadeh Iran
C. P. Burgess Canada
Feng-Li Lin relative to Brando Bellazzini Italy Brando Bellazzini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Brando Bellazzini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feng-Li Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feng-Li Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng-Li Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng-Li Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feng-Li Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng-Li Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng-Li Lin. The network helps show where Feng-Li Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feng-Li Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feng-Li Lin Line = papers co-authored together Feng-Li Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200866
2 200656
3 200556
4 200754
5 199946
6 201037
7 201730
8 201927
9 200123
10 200920
11 201620
12 202217
13 201117
14 201317
15 201317
16 202216
17 199916
18 201016
19 201115
20 202114

About Feng-Li Lin

Feng-Li Lin is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 849 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (43 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (38 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (19 papers), Quantum many-body systems (12 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (12 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (7 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (5 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (565 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (501 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (191 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (292 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (82 citations). Feng-Li Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Ching-Yu Huang, Jiaju Zhang, Hsien-Chung Kao, Bin Chen, Song He, Hong Zhang, Shoichi Kawamoto, Chopin Soo, Sera Cremonini and Takayuki Hirayama. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, Journal of High Energy Physics, Physics Letters B, Nuclear Physics B and Physical Review A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact