Feng-Chen Li

5.2k citations
265 papers · 4.3k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Feng-Chen Li

249 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Peers

Feng-Chen Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 779
  • Computational Mechanics 1.1k
  • Mechanical Engineering 1.1k
  • Biomedical Engineering 836
  • Mechanics of Materials 486
Replace Reinhold Kneer with:
Reinhold Kneer Germany
K. Nandakumar Canada
A. Carlos Fernandez‐Pello United States
S. I. Abdel‐Khalik United States
Rakesh Mishra India
Robert J. Poole United Kingdom
Yuri S. Muzychka Canada
Mingshu Bi China
Guihua Tang China
David L. Frost Canada
Feng-Chen Li relative to Reinhold Kneer Germany Reinhold Kneer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Reinhold Kneer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feng-Chen Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feng-Chen Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng-Chen Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng-Chen Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feng-Chen Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng-Chen Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng-Chen Li. The network helps show where Feng-Chen Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feng-Chen Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feng-Chen Li Line = papers co-authored together Feng-Chen Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 265 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011195
2 2017180
3 2018154
4 2012118
5 2013117
6 2007105
7 200489
8 201383
9 201978
10 200477
11 201072
12 201271
13 201766
14 201164
15 201362
16 202062
17 201661
18 201059
19 201152
20 201652

About Feng-Chen Li

Feng-Chen Li is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 265 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (60 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (57 papers), Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps (41 papers), Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies (31 papers), Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics (19 papers), Heat Transfer and Optimization (14 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer (13 papers) and Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (779 citations), Computational Mechanics (1.1k citations), Mechanical Engineering (1.1k citations), Biomedical Engineering (836 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (486 citations). Feng-Chen Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Xiaobin Li, Yasuo Kawaguchi, Hong-Na Zhang, Hong-Na Zhang, Weihua Cai, Bo Yu, Juan-Cheng Yang, Yurong He, Hui Li and Wen‐Li Chen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Applied Thermal Engineering, Physics of Fluids, Nuclear Engineering and Design and Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact