Felicity Jane Pool

542 citations
14 papers · 374 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Felicity Jane Pool

14 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers

Felicity Jane Pool
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 173
  • Health Informatics 11
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 140
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 80
  • Toxicology 9
Replace Vasu Gooty with:
Vasu Gooty United States
Michael Birch United Kingdom
L. D. Lewis United States
Christina H. Ruhlmann Denmark
Ken O’Day United States
Maria Luisa Della Bona Italy
Fiona Wan United States
María Luisa Russo Italy
René Bouw United Kingdom
Y L Yu Hong Kong
Felicity Jane Pool relative to Vasu Gooty United States Vasu Gooty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Vasu Gooty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Felicity Jane Pool

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felicity Jane Pool's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felicity Jane Pool with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felicity Jane Pool more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felicity Jane Pool

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felicity Jane Pool. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felicity Jane Pool. The network helps show where Felicity Jane Pool may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Felicity Jane Pool, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Felicity Jane Pool Line = papers co-authored together Felicity Jane Pool links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1998120
2 201043
3 201330
4 201229
5 200029
6 200525
7 201823
8 200022
9 200218
10 200916
11
Occult femoral neck fractures in the elderly: optimisation of investigation.
19969
12 20185
13 20203
14 20222

About Felicity Jane Pool

Felicity Jane Pool is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental health, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiology practices and education (4 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (2 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (1 paper), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (1 paper), Soft tissue tumor case studies (1 paper) and Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (173 citations), Health Informatics (11 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (140 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (80 citations) and Toxicology (9 citations). Felicity Jane Pool has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Frank Besag, David J. Berry, Stacy Goergen, Thomas Choudary Putti, Pooja Jagmohan, Antonia Nomayo, Jaya Natarajan, Dennis R. Doose, Graham Roberts and Sarah Aylett. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, Epilepsy & Behavior, Clinical Breast Cancer, Seizure and The Breast Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact