Feifei Liang

447 citations
32 papers · 310 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Feifei Liang

27 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Feifei Liang
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 210
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 114
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 60
  • Human-Computer Interaction 20
  • Artificial Intelligence 81
Replace Jonathan Mirault with:
Jonathan Mirault France
Mallory C. Stites United States
Carolina Gattei Argentina
Kayleigh L. Warrington United Kingdom
Anna Laurinavichyute Germany
Sarah Risse Germany
Daniela Mertzen Germany
Enrique Meseguer Spain
Ana Marcet Spain
Kaidi Lõo Canada
Feifei Liang relative to Jonathan Mirault France Jonathan Mirault's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Jonathan Mirault · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feifei Liang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feifei Liang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feifei Liang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feifei Liang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feifei Liang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feifei Liang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feifei Liang. The network helps show where Feifei Liang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feifei Liang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feifei Liang Line = papers co-authored together Feifei Liang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201287
2 201258
3 201330
4 201521
5 201717
6 202012
7 202112
8 202412
9 202310
10 20228
11 20227
12 20175
13 20234
14 20154
15 20193
16 20223
17 20232
18 20192
19 20222
20 20132

About Feifei Liang

Feifei Liang is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 32 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (15 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (7 papers), Text Readability and Simplification (6 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (5 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (1 paper) and Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (210 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (114 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (60 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (20 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (81 citations). Feifei Liang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Xuejun Bai, Simon P. Liversedge, Chuanli Zang, Guoli Yan, Hazel I. Blythe, Jingxin Wang, Xin Li, Zhenying Wang, Tiantao Zhang and Liping Dai. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Research in Reading, Journal of Memory and Language, Reading and Writing, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters and BMC Pulmonary Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact