F.C.T. Guiking
Impact in
- Soil Science top 5%
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Irrigation Practices and Water Management
- Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Papers in
-
- Phosphorus and nutrient management 1
-
- Crop Yield and Soil Fertility 1
- Co-authors
- B.H. Janssen (5 shared papers)D. van der Eijk (4 shared papers)J. Wolf (2 shared papers)E.M.A. Smaling (3 shared papers)H. van Reuler (3 shared papers)L.O. Fresco (1 shared paper)D.M. Jansen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Geoderma (1 paper)Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (4 papers)Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
F.C.T. Guiking
5 papers receiving 393 citations
F.C.T. Guiking's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Soil Science 246
- Agronomy and Crop Science 126
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57
- Plant Science 248
- Environmental Chemistry 54
Countries citing papers authored by F.C.T. Guiking
This map shows the geographic impact of F.C.T. Guiking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.C.T. Guiking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.C.T. Guiking more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F.C.T. Guiking
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.C.T. Guiking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.C.T. Guiking. The network helps show where F.C.T. Guiking may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside F.C.T. Guiking, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A system for quantitative evaluation of the fertility of tropical soils (QUEFTS) Hit paper breakdown → | 1990 | 417 |
| 2 | 1990 | 12 | |
| 3 | Soil fertility. Nutrient availability | 1982 | 3 |
| 4 | The use of simplified nutrient balances at farm level to determine boundary conditions for sustainable production. | 1994 | 3 |
| 5 | A system for quantitative evaluation of soil fertility and the response to fertilizers. | 1989 | 3 |
| 6 | A new approach to evaluate the chemical fertility of tropical soils. | 1986 | 2 |
About F.C.T. Guiking
F.C.T. Guiking is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Agronomy and Crop Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Soil Science and Plant Science, having authored 6 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Banana Cultivation and Research (1 paper), Phosphorus and nutrient management (1 paper), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (1 paper), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (1 paper) and Soil and Land Suitability Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (246 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (126 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (57 citations), Plant Science (248 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (54 citations). Frequent co-authors include B.H. Janssen, D. van der Eijk, J. Wolf, E.M.A. Smaling, H. van Reuler, L.O. Fresco and D.M. Jansen. Their work appears in journals such as Geoderma, Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling and Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.