F.C. Smith

31 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers

F.C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Biophysics 48
  • Mechanical Engineering 274
  • Polymers and Plastics 98
  • Analytical Chemistry 61
  • Aerospace Engineering 146
Replace Per-Erik Bengtsson with:
Per-Erik Bengtsson Sweden
Michael Golombok Netherlands
Koichi Hishida Japan
Zygmunt Mierczyk Poland
John H. Campbell United States
Chuanliang Li China
Om Prakash India
Fubing Bao China
Ruihua Wang China
Jeanette Hussong Germany
F.C. Smith relative to Per-Erik Bengtsson Sweden Per-Erik Bengtsson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Per-Erik Bengtsson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F.C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F.C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F.C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.C. Smith. The network helps show where F.C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F.C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F.C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together F.C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004158
2 200378
3 200058
4 201941
5 199939
6 199935
7 199231
8 200426
9 201723
10 199422
11 201722
12 201721
13 201620
14 199519
15 200213
16 201713
17 200212
18 200310
19 19779
20 20028

About F.C. Smith

F.C. Smith is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Analytical Chemistry, Biophysics, Geophysics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 691 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies (10 papers), Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques (6 papers), Cellular and Composite Structures (6 papers), Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements (5 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (5 papers), Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics (4 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (4 papers) and Microwave Engineering and Waveguides (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (48 citations), Mechanical Engineering (274 citations), Polymers and Plastics (98 citations), Analytical Chemistry (61 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (146 citations). F.C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Fabrizio L. Scarpa, Barry Chambers, Joseph P. Smith, Karl S. Booksh, Gaetano Burriesci, John C. Bennett, C.R. Brewitt-Taylor, B. P. Glass, Sirajul Haq and Bruce M. Simonson. Their work appears in journals such as Electronics Letters, Applied Spectroscopy, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, The Aeronautical Journal and The Analyst.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact