F.C. Flower
Impact in
- Small Animals top 0.1%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Animal Science and Zoology top 0.5%
- Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
Papers in
-
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 10
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia 1
-
- Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock 5
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology 2
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 1
- Co-authors
- Daniel M. Weary (10 shared papers)David J. Sanderson (4 shared papers)Lee Niel (1 shared paper)David Fraser (1 shared paper)A.M. de Passillé (1 shared paper)J. Rushen (1 shared paper)J.A. Fregonesi (1 shared paper)Cassandra B. Tucker (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Dairy Science (6 papers)Applied Animal Behaviour Science (2 papers)Animal Welfare (1 paper)Optometry and Vision Science (1 paper)animal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
F.C. Flower
11 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Small Animals 1.3k
- Animal Science and Zoology 870
- Equine 108
- Agronomy and Crop Science 336
- Genetics 484
Countries citing papers authored by F.C. Flower
This map shows the geographic impact of F.C. Flower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.C. Flower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.C. Flower more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F.C. Flower
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.C. Flower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.C. Flower. The network helps show where F.C. Flower may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside F.C. Flower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 374 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 237 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 236 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 126 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 105 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 73 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 69 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 58 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 57 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 53 | |
| 11 | 1972 | 3 |
About F.C. Flower
F.C. Flower is a scholar working on Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology, Plant Science, Genetics and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (10 papers), Agriculture and Farm Safety (6 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (5 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (4 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (2 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (1 paper), Meat and Animal Product Quality (1 paper) and Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (1.3k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (870 citations), Equine (108 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (336 citations) and Genetics (484 citations). F.C. Flower has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel M. Weary, David J. Sanderson, Lee Niel, David Fraser, A.M. de Passillé, J. Rushen, J.A. Fregonesi, Cassandra B. Tucker, M.A.G. von Keyserlingk and Richard M. Hill. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dairy Science, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Animal Welfare, Optometry and Vision Science and animal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.