Faten Hamad

37 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

Faten Hamad
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Library and Information Sciences 49
  • Information Systems and Management 103
  • Information Systems 145
  • Management Information Systems 57
  • Health Informatics 8
Replace Sarantos Kapidakis with:
Sarantos Kapidakis Greece
Asefeh Asemi Iran
Chetna Gupta India
Judith Segal United Kingdom
Majed Alshamari Saudi Arabia
Byron Marshall United States
Alisha D. Malloy United States
Zainuddin Hassan Malaysia
Shuguang Han United States
Peter J. Nürnberg Denmark
Faten Hamad relative to Sarantos Kapidakis Greece Sarantos Kapidakis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.2×
Sarantos Kapidakis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Faten Hamad

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Faten Hamad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Faten Hamad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Faten Hamad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Faten Hamad

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Faten Hamad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Faten Hamad. The network helps show where Faten Hamad may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Faten Hamad, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Faten Hamad Line = papers co-authored together Faten Hamad links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202041
2 201934
3 202233
4 202332
5 202031
6 202427
7 202027
8 201527
9 202126
10 202324
11 202324
12 201815
13 202213
14 202412
15 201611
16 20247
17 20227
18 20227
19 20236
20 20166

About Faten Hamad

Faten Hamad is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Library and Information Sciences and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 45 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (7 papers), Organizational and Employee Performance (5 papers), Library Science and Administration (5 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (4 papers), Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research (4 papers), Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms (4 papers), Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (3 papers) and Data Quality and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (49 citations), Information Systems and Management (103 citations), Information Systems (145 citations), Management Information Systems (57 citations) and Health Informatics (8 citations). Faten Hamad has collaborated with scholars based in Jordan, Oman and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include Hussam N. Fakhouri, Sadi Alawadi, Feras M. Awaysheh, Ahmed Shehata, Adel Al Khattab, Sharif Naser Makhadmeh, Mohammad Hashem Ryalat, Ahmad Sami Al‐Shamayleh, Ahmad K. Al Hwaitat and Ahmed Mahfouz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, IFLA Journal, New Review of Academic Librarianship, Library Management and Online Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact