Fang‐Ming Chen

424 citations
17 papers · 375 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Fang‐Ming Chen

16 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers

Fang‐Ming Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Condensed Matter Physics 92
  • Biomaterials 62
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 61
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 29
  • Pharmaceutical Science 11
Replace Xuefeng Kan with:
Xuefeng Kan China
Penghui Yang China
Zhengxiao Li China
H Maruyama Japan
Rendall Strawbridge United States
Xia Meng China
Yiping Gong China
Zhitao Chen China
Marina Serra Italy
Debbie M. Lovato United States
Fang‐Ming Chen relative to Xuefeng Kan China Xuefeng Kan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.7×
Xuefeng Kan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fang‐Ming Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fang‐Ming Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fang‐Ming Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fang‐Ming Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fang‐Ming Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fang‐Ming Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fang‐Ming Chen. The network helps show where Fang‐Ming Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fang‐Ming Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fang‐Ming Chen Line = papers co-authored together Fang‐Ming Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201699
2 201897
3 201032
4 201626
5 201919
6 201716
7 201416
8 201614
9 201212
10 200511
11 201810
12 201310
13 20205
14 20175
15 20172
16 20111
17 20250

About Fang‐Ming Chen

Fang‐Ming Chen is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Oncology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 17 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (7 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (4 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (2 papers), ZnO doping and properties (2 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (2 papers), Ga2O3 and related materials (2 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (1 paper) and Renal cell carcinoma treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (92 citations), Biomaterials (62 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (61 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (29 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (11 citations). Fang‐Ming Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Hong‐Xi Xu, Yen‐Kuang Kuo, Yang Zhou, Ping Jian, Bing-Mae Chen, Tian‐Lu Cheng, Bo-Ting Liou, Jaw‐Yuan Wang, Steve R. Roffler and Hsin-Ell Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Letters, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, Optics Express and BMC Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact