F. W. Doss

940 citations
52 papers · 581 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

F. W. Doss

49 papers receiving 571 citations

Peers

F. W. Doss
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 428
  • Computational Mechanics 230
  • Geophysics 98
  • Mechanics of Materials 154
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 144
Replace William Taitano with:
William Taitano United States
Baolian Cheng United States
Mark Gunderson United States
G. R. Magelssen United States
A. Marocchino Italy
Michel Busquet France
Milan Kuchařík Czechia
Bhuvana Srinivasan United States
Petros Tzeferacos United States
C. Michaut France
F. W. Doss relative to William Taitano United States William Taitano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
William Taitano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. W. Doss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. W. Doss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. W. Doss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. W. Doss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. W. Doss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. W. Doss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. W. Doss. The network helps show where F. W. Doss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. W. Doss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. W. Doss Line = papers co-authored together F. W. Doss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201341
2 201539
3 200539
4 200536
5 200934
6 201430
7 201327
8 201624
9 200922
10 201322
11 201818
12 201517
13 201915
14 201113
15 201313
16 201712
17 201612
18 201112
19 201610
20 201710

About F. W. Doss

F. W. Doss is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Geophysics, having authored 52 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (42 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (15 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (11 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (10 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (9 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (8 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (5 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (428 citations), Computational Mechanics (230 citations), Geophysics (98 citations), Mechanics of Materials (154 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (144 citations). F. W. Doss has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kirk Flippo, Eric Loomis, Elizabeth Merritt, J. R. Fincke, R. P. Drake, L. Welser-Sherrill, Carolyn Kuranz, J. L. Kline, Carlos Di Stéfano and B. M. Haines. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Review of Scientific Instruments, High Energy Density Physics, Fusion Science & Technology and Physical review. E.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact