F W Cross

1.3k citations
41 papers · 923 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

F W Cross

37 papers receiving 886 citations

Peers

F W Cross
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 334
  • Biophysics 78
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 53
  • Dermatology 61
  • Internal Medicine 21
Replace Daniel S.J. Choy with:
Daniel S.J. Choy United States
Thanassis Papaioannou United States
Sanjiv Sharma India
Joseph E. Hayward Canada
Ehiichi Kohda Japan
Marjolein van der Voort Netherlands
P.O. Byrne United Kingdom
Jeffrey A. Leppo United States
Rami Nachabé Netherlands
K Matthewson United Kingdom
F W Cross relative to Daniel S.J. Choy United States Daniel S.J. Choy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Daniel S.J. Choy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F W Cross

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F W Cross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F W Cross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F W Cross more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F W Cross

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F W Cross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F W Cross. The network helps show where F W Cross may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F W Cross, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F W Cross Line = papers co-authored together F W Cross links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999308
2 2012133
3 198751
4 198548
5 198846
6 201146
7 198537
8 198531
9 199429
10
Ankle blood pressure measured by automatic oscillotonometry: a comparison with Doppler pressure measurements.
198726
11 198624
12 199320
13 198719
14 198912
15 199012
16 198710
17 19879
18 20107
19 19896
20 19886

About F W Cross

F W Cross is a scholar working on Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dermatology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 41 papers that have together received 923 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Treatment (8 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (7 papers), Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (7 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (7 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (4 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (3 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (3 papers) and Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (334 citations), Biophysics (78 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (53 citations), Dermatology (61 citations) and Internal Medicine (21 citations). F W Cross has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Richard Doornbos, Henricus J. C. M. Sterenborg, Maurice C. G. Aalders, Rossano Lang, L T Cotton, P. E. Dyer, A E P Cameron, A. J. MacRobert, T J Bowker and Stephen G. Bown. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, Lasers in Medical Science, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Applied Physics Letters and The American Journal of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact