F. Schäfer

2.9k citations
49 papers · 1.9k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

F. Schäfer

49 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

F. Schäfer
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 676
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.2k
  • Language and Linguistics 390
  • Condensed Matter Physics 224
  • Linguistics and Language 87
Replace Walter Hofstetter with:
Walter Hofstetter Germany
Gregg Jaeger United States
Xiaopeng Li China
Leonard Mlodinow United States
Anton Zeilinger Austria
J.-Y. Courtois France
Francesco Caravelli United States
Philippe Jacquod Switzerland
Shuo Yang China
N. Olsson Sweden
F. Schäfer relative to Walter Hofstetter Germany Walter Hofstetter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.8×
Walter Hofstetter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Schäfer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Schäfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Schäfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Schäfer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Schäfer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Schäfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Schäfer. The network helps show where F. Schäfer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Schäfer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Schäfer Line = papers co-authored together F. Schäfer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014283
2 2012251
3 2014114
4 2010104
5 201190
6 200281
7 201377
8 201075
9
PP licensing in nominalizations
200760
10 201559
11 200757
12
Instrument subjects are agents or causers
200650
13 200948
14 200642
15 201141
16 201337
17 201437
18 201035
19 200731
20 201327

About F. Schäfer

F. Schäfer is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Language and Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence and Linguistics and Language, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (18 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (17 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (13 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (8 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (6 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (5 papers) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (676 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.2k citations), Language and Linguistics (390 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (224 citations) and Linguistics and Language (87 citations). F. Schäfer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Dietz, Άρτεμις Αλεξιάδου, M. Miski-Oglu, A. Richter, H. L. Harney, Stefan Bittner, Thomas Friedrich, Uwe Günther, Pietro Lombardi and Carsten Timm. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. A, New Journal of Physics, Nature Communications and Physical Review A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact