F. Noack

4.9k citations
195 papers · 3.7k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

F. Noack

191 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

F. Noack
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.8k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 409
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.3k
  • Spectroscopy 354
  • Reproductive Medicine 122
Replace Akio Hiraki with:
Akio Hiraki Japan
Naoto Yamamoto Japan
Thomas Fischer Germany
Thomas F. Deutsch United States
Martin Förster United Kingdom
Jacob M. Rowe United States
Tetsuya Shimizu Japan
Wolfhard Semmler Germany
Hiroyuki Fujimoto Japan
Matthias Taupitz Germany
F. Noack relative to Akio Hiraki Japan Akio Hiraki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.1×
Akio Hiraki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Noack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Noack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Noack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Noack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Noack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Noack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Noack. The network helps show where F. Noack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Noack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Noack Line = papers co-authored together F. Noack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 195 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998130
2 2007122
3 200082
4 199381
5 199678
6 201178
7 199976
8
Histopathological grading of ascending aortic aneurysm: comparison of patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve.
200373
9 200469
10 201162
11 200161
12 201060
13 200358
14 199657
15 199656
16 199855
17 200955
18 199447
19 201146
20 201746

About F. Noack

F. Noack is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Computational Mechanics and Spectroscopy, having authored 195 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (66 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (57 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (37 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (24 papers), Crystal Structures and Properties (17 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (15 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (13 papers) and Laser Design and Applications (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.8k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (409 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.3k citations), Spectroscopy (354 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (122 citations). F. Noack has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Valentin Petrov, Fabıan Rotermund, M. Ghotbi, Marcus Beutler, F. Seifert, I. V. Hertel, O. Kittelmann, J. Ringling, W. Radloff and Steven E. Schild. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Letters, Optics Express, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, Chemical Physics Letters and Vascular Health and Risk Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact