F. Irie

607 citations
40 papers · 381 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

F. Irie

38 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers

F. Irie
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Condensed Matter Physics 224
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 124
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 45
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 136
  • Neurology 31
Replace D. D’Agostino with:
D. D’Agostino Netherlands
Yaohui Fan Australia
Haruki Sanada Japan
O. Usenko Netherlands
K. M. S. V. Bandara United States
G. Danby United States
Tomoko Fuse Japan
A. Dargys Lithuania
Mikko Varonen Finland
F. Irie relative to D. D’Agostino Netherlands D. D’Agostino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
D. D’Agostino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Irie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Irie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Irie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Irie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Irie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Irie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Irie. The network helps show where F. Irie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Irie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Irie Line = papers co-authored together F. Irie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984101
2 198553
3 202222
4 197820
5 199920
6 200319
7 198316
8 199715
9 198010
10 20238
11 19858
12 20237
13 20237
14 20037
15 19836
16
[Acute cervical spinal epidural hematoma during antithrombotic therapy: dual warnings against antithrombotic therapy].
20036
17 19835
18 19995
19 19975
20 20234

About F. Irie

F. Irie is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Epidemiology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (18 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (16 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (6 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (5 papers), Frequency Control in Power Systems (3 papers), Electric Motor Design and Analysis (3 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (3 papers) and Nonlinear Photonic Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (224 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (124 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (45 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (136 citations) and Neurology (31 citations). F. Irie has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Keiji Yoshida, Keiji Enpuku, Tadao Nagatsuma, K. Hamasaki, F. Sumiyoshi, Masahiro Kamouchi, Tetsuro Ago, Ryu Matsuo, Yoshinobu Wakisaka and Takanari Kitazono. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, PLoS ONE, Journal of Applied Physics, Cryogenics and Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact