F. Devos

686 citations
63 papers · 438 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

F. Devos

53 papers receiving 385 citations

Peers

F. Devos
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Media Technology 87
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 284
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 147
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 3
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 59
Replace Nathan Schemm with:
Nathan Schemm United States
Richard Hornsey Canada
Tien‐Hsin Chao United States
Antoine Dupret France
M. Schwarz Germany
Atsutake Kosuge Japan
John D. Downie United States
F.E. Terman United States
T. C. Strand United States
F. Devos relative to Nathan Schemm United States Nathan Schemm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Nathan Schemm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Devos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Devos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Devos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Devos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Devos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Devos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Devos. The network helps show where F. Devos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Devos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Devos Line = papers co-authored together F. Devos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199375
2 197951
3 198827
4 197626
5 199721
6 197721
7 197515
8 197714
9 198913
10 200111
11 198710
12 19939
13 20029
14 19998
15 19808
16 20018
17 20057
18 19957
19 19906
20 19935

About F. Devos

F. Devos is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 63 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (27 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (9 papers), Cellular Automata and Applications (8 papers), Image Processing Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (6 papers), Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design (6 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (5 papers) and Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (87 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (284 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (147 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (3 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (59 citations). F. Devos has collaborated with scholars based in France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include J. F. Delpech, Bertrand Zavidovique, J. Boulmer, Thierry Bernard, Patrick Garda, J. C. Gauthier, Pierre Chavel, Jean Taboury, Yang Ni and Ming Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Machine Vision and Applications, Electronics Letters, Sensors and Actuators A Physical and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact