F. Dannheim

497 citations
33 papers · 401 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

F. Dannheim

31 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers

F. Dannheim
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Ophthalmology 245
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 120
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 52
  • Neurology 11
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 22
Replace A. Gordon Balazsi with:
A. Gordon Balazsi Canada
Itay Ben-Zion Israel
Jens Paetzold Germany
Faran Sabeti Australia
E. Krapp Germany
Jacqueline M. Nelson-Quigg United States
B. Rassow Germany
Lynn Marran United States
Kimberly E. Cello United States
D Poinoosawmy United Kingdom
F. Dannheim relative to A. Gordon Balazsi Canada A. Gordon Balazsi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
A. Gordon Balazsi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Dannheim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Dannheim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Dannheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Dannheim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Dannheim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Dannheim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Dannheim. The network helps show where F. Dannheim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside F. Dannheim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Dannheim Line = papers co-authored together F. Dannheim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Sensitivity and specificity of optic disc parameters in chronic glaucoma.
199358
2 199055
3 200531
4 201030
5
Studies of spatial summation of central retinal areas in normal people of all ages.
197126
6 198225
7 197420
8 200518
9 198114
10 198014
11 200313
12 200512
13 197811
14 200610
15 20068
16 20138
17 19837
18 19817
19 20076
20 19836

About F. Dannheim

F. Dannheim is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (17 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (3 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (2 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (245 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (120 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (52 citations), Neurology (11 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (22 citations). F. Dannheim has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ulrich Schiefer, D. Dannheim, Jörg Weber, Drance Sm, Erik L. Greve, B. Rassow, Bettina Wabbels, Michael Wall, Chris A. Johnson and Pamela A. Sample. Their work appears in journals such as Der Ophthalmologe, European Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Research, Optometry and Vision Science and Ophthalmologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact