F. D. Rose

69 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

F. D. Rose
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Human-Computer Interaction 577
  • Rehabilitation 470
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 544
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 301
  • Occupational Therapy 80
Replace Barbara Brooks with:
Barbara Brooks United Kingdom
Elizabeth A. Attree United Kingdom
J. Galen Buckwalter United States
Elisa Pedroli Italy
Maria T. Schultheis United States
Évelyne Klinger France
Penny Standen United Kingdom
Naomi Josman Israel
Rachel Kizony Israel
Jeonghun Ku South Korea
F. D. Rose relative to Barbara Brooks United Kingdom Barbara Brooks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Barbara Brooks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. D. Rose

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. D. Rose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. D. Rose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. D. Rose more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. D. Rose

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. D. Rose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. D. Rose. The network helps show where F. D. Rose may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. D. Rose, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. D. Rose Line = papers co-authored together F. D. Rose links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005380
2 2000296
3 1998154
4 1996103
5 199990
6 199883
7 200480
8 200277
9 199576
10 200272
11 200359
12 199149
13 198746
14
Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly
200144
15 200240
16 199637
17
Virtual reality in rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury
199637
18
Virtual environments in brain damage rehabilitation: a rationale from basic neuroscience.
199834
19 199933
20 199333

About F. D. Rose

F. D. Rose is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Law and Rehabilitation, having authored 78 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (15 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (11 papers), Legal principles and applications (9 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers), Law, logistics, and international trade (6 papers), European and International Contract Law (6 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (5 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (577 citations), Rehabilitation (470 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (544 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (301 citations) and Occupational Therapy (80 citations). F. D. Rose has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Brooks, Elizabeth A. Attree, Albert Rizzo, David A. Johnson, David Parslow, Paul Penn, Tori Andrews, Veronica J. Thomas, J. Potter and Luigi Pugnetti. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, Behavioural Brain Research, Advances in experimental medicine and biology, Physiology & Behavior and The Cambridge Law Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact