F. Cleva
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.5%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 72
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 35
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 17
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 13
- Oceanography 21
- Geophysics and Gravity Measurements 21
- Co-authors
- Alain Brillet (2 shared papers)C N Man (1 shared paper)Magali Loupias (1 shared paper)H. Trinquet (1 shared paper)François Bondu (1 shared paper)Ronic Chiche (1 shared paper)Henrich Heitmann (1 shared paper)C. N. Man (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Physical review. D (25 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (9 papers)Physical Review Letters (8 papers)Classical and Quantum Gravity (7 papers)The Astrophysical Journal Letters (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceGermany
In The Last Decade
F. Cleva
77 papers receiving 11.2k citations
F. Cleva's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 11.0k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.9k
- Oceanography 1.5k
- Geophysics 1.5k
- Ocean Engineering 552
Countries citing papers authored by F. Cleva
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Cleva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Cleva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Cleva more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. Cleva
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Cleva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Cleva. The network helps show where F. Cleva may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside F. Cleva, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass ∼ 3.4 M ⊙ Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 1268 |
| 2 | GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M ⊙ Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 1022 |
| 3 | Properties of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817 Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 990 |
| 4 | Predictions for the rates of compact binary coalescences observable by ground-based gravitational-wave detectors Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 812 |
| 5 | Population Properties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO–Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 730 |
| 6 | Tests of general relativity with the binary black hole signals from the LIGO-Virgo catalog GWTC-1 Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 637 |
| 7 | Binary Black Hole Population Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 613 |
| 8 | Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star-Black Hole Coalescences Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 538 |
| 9 | GW190412: Observation of a binary-black-hole coalescence with asymmetric masses Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 508 |
| 10 | Tests of General Relativity with GW170817 Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 497 |
| 11 | GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 370 |
| 12 | Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational-wave background from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 339 |
| 13 | Increasing the Astrophysical Reach of the Advanced Virgo Detector via the Application of Squeezed Vacuum States of Light Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 314 |
| 14 | Search for the isotropic stochastic background using data from Advanced LIGO’s second observing run Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 245 |
| 15 | 2019 | 180 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 140 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 116 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 103 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 98 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 89 |
About F. Cleva
F. Cleva is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography, Geophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 77 papers that have together received 11.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (72 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (35 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (21 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (17 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (13 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (8 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (8 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (11.0k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.9k citations), Oceanography (1.5k citations), Geophysics (1.5k citations) and Ocean Engineering (552 citations). F. Cleva has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Alain Brillet, C N Man, Magali Loupias, H. Trinquet, François Bondu, Ronic Chiche, Henrich Heitmann and C. N. Man. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, The Astrophysical Journal, Physical Review Letters, Classical and Quantum Gravity and The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.