Erwin Knippenberg
Impact in
- Soil Science top 10%
- Agricultural risk and resilience
- Land Rights and Reforms
-
- Agricultural Economics and Policy
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Papers in
-
- Agricultural risk and resilience 4
- Land Rights and Reforms 2
-
- Climate change impacts on agriculture 3
- Co-authors
- Ariel Ortiz‐Bobea (1 shared paper)Robert G. Chambers (1 shared paper)Nathaniel Jensen (1 shared paper)Mark A. Constas (1 shared paper)Dean Jolliffe (2 shared papers)John Hoddinott (2 shared papers)Apichon Witayangkurn (2 shared papers)Shahrzad Gholami (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- World Development (1 paper)American Journal of Agricultural Economics (1 paper)Frontiers in Nutrition (1 paper)Science Advances (1 paper)RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsJapan
In The Last Decade
Erwin Knippenberg
10 papers receiving 257 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Soil Science 132
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 87
- Nutrition and Dietetics 28
- Global and Planetary Change 39
Countries citing papers authored by Erwin Knippenberg
This map shows the geographic impact of Erwin Knippenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erwin Knippenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erwin Knippenberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erwin Knippenberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erwin Knippenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erwin Knippenberg. The network helps show where Erwin Knippenberg may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Erwin Knippenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 110 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 81 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 2 |
About Erwin Knippenberg
Erwin Knippenberg is a scholar working on Soil Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science and Ecology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural risk and resilience (4 papers), Climate change impacts on agriculture (3 papers), Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (2 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (2 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (2 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (2 papers), Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis (2 papers) and Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (132 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (64 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (87 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (28 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (39 citations). Erwin Knippenberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Ariel Ortiz‐Bobea, Robert G. Chambers, Nathaniel Jensen, Mark A. Constas, Dean Jolliffe, John Hoddinott, Apichon Witayangkurn, Shahrzad Gholami, Mattia Amadio and Juan Lavista Ferres. Their work appears in journals such as World Development, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Frontiers in Nutrition, Science Advances and RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.