Erin Ash
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Sports, Gender, and Society
- Media, Gender, and Advertising
-
- Media Influence and Health
Papers in
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 6
- Sport and Mega-Event Impacts 3
- Digital Games and Media 3
-
- Media Influence and Health 11
- Co-authors
- Mary Beth Oliver (3 shared papers)Julia K. Woolley (2 shared papers)Gregory A. Cranmer (5 shared papers)Jennifer Hoewe (2 shared papers)Mun‐Young Chung (1 shared paper)Marie Hardin (3 shared papers)Erin Whiteside (2 shared papers)Mike Schmierbach (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Mass Communication & Society (3 papers)Health Communication (2 papers)Communication & Sport (2 papers)Howard Journal of Communications (1 paper)Journal of Social Issues (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Erin Ash
23 papers receiving 293 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Gender Studies 97
- Literature and Literary Theory 98
- Communication 42
- Human-Computer Interaction 34
- Applied Psychology 22
Countries citing papers authored by Erin Ash
This map shows the geographic impact of Erin Ash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erin Ash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erin Ash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erin Ash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erin Ash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erin Ash. The network helps show where Erin Ash may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Erin Ash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 90 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 56 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 19 | Effects of a trend: The influence of user comments on readers' perceptions of online newspapers | 2009 | 2 |
| 20 | 2025 | 1 |
About Erin Ash
Erin Ash is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Gender Studies, Communication and Social Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (11 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Media Studies and Communication (5 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (4 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Digital Games and Media (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (97 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (98 citations), Communication (42 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (34 citations) and Applied Psychology (22 citations). Erin Ash has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Mary Beth Oliver, Julia K. Woolley, Gregory A. Cranmer, Jennifer Hoewe, Mun‐Young Chung, Marie Hardin, Erin Whiteside, Mike Schmierbach, Bryan E. Denham and Jimmy Sanderson. Their work appears in journals such as Mass Communication & Society, Health Communication, Communication & Sport, Howard Journal of Communications and Journal of Social Issues.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.