Eric T. Dean

401 citations
12 papers · 192 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
    • Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
    • Migration, Health and Trauma
    • Resilience and Mental Health
    • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • History top 5%
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes

Papers in

    • American Political and Social Dynamics 3
    • Medical History and Innovations 2
    • Medical History and Research 1
    • Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices 4

Eric T. Dean

10 papers receiving 122 citations

Peers

Eric T. Dean
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Clinical Psychology 95
  • History 37
  • General Psychology 4
  • General Health Professions 36
  • Political Science and International Relations 33
Replace Johanna Schoen with:
Johanna Schoen United States
Marijke Gijswijt‐Hofstra Netherlands
Roberto Beneduce Italy
Eleanor Roosevelt
Peter Dale Scott United Kingdom
Belinda Cooper United Kingdom
Herbert Waltzer United States
Terence Morris United Kingdom
Michael G. Roskin United States
M. Jeanne Peterson
Eric T. Dean relative to Johanna Schoen United States Johanna Schoen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Johanna Schoen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric T. Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric T. Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric T. Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric T. Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric T. Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric T. Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric T. Dean. The network helps show where Eric T. Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Eric T. Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric T. Dean Line = papers co-authored together Eric T. Dean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 199970
2 199231
3 199825
4 199821
5 199916
6 199113
7 19937
8 19993
9 20012
10 19952
11 19951
12 20131

About Eric T. Dean

Eric T. Dean is a scholar working on History, Clinical Psychology, General Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (4 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (3 papers), Medical History and Innovations (2 papers), Research, Science, and Academia (1 paper), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper), History of Medical Practice (1 paper), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper) and Medical History and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (95 citations), History (37 citations), General Psychology (4 citations), General Health Professions (36 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (33 citations). Eric T. Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen E. Ambrose. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, Civil War history, The Journal of Military History, The Journal of Southern History and War in History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact