Eric Swank

1.9k citations
70 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Eric Swank

65 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Eric Swank
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Gender Studies 529
  • Public Administration 159
  • Social Psychology 773
  • Reproductive Medicine 127
  • Sociology and Political Science 602
Replace Kim A. Case with:
Kim A. Case United States
N. Eugene Walls United States
Adital Ben‐Ari Israel
Breanne Fahs United States
Patrick R. Grzanka United States
Laurel Westbrook United States
Laina Y. Bay‐Cheng United States
Rebecca L. Stotzer United States
James M. Croteau United States
Juan Battle United States
Eric Swank relative to Kim A. Case United States Kim A. Case's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Kim A. Case · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric Swank

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Swank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Swank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Swank more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Swank

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Swank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Swank. The network helps show where Eric Swank may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Eric Swank, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric Swank Line = papers co-authored together Eric Swank links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013122
2 2012104
3 201279
4 201278
5 201074
6 200669
7 201257
8 201055
9 201351
10 200749
11 201348
12 201037
13
Test Cheating in a Rural College: Studying the Importance of Individual and Situational Factors
200437
14 201637
15 199933
16 201832
17 201229
18 201829
19 201127
20 201421

About Eric Swank

Eric Swank is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Public Administration, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (31 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (18 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (14 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (8 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (8 papers), Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (6 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (529 citations), Public Administration (159 citations), Social Psychology (773 citations), Reproductive Medicine (127 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (602 citations). Eric Swank has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Breanne Fahs, Lisa Raiz, David M. Frost, Michael R. Woodford, Kristin S. Scherrer, Perry Silverschanz, Thomas R. Rochon, David S. Meyer, H. Carl Haywood and Brittanie Atteberry‐Ash. Their work appears in journals such as Sexuality Research and Social Policy, Journal of Homosexuality, Sexuality & Culture, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Journal of Women Politics & Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact