Eric Stokes

28 papers receiving 538 citations

Eric Stokes's Hit Papers

The English Utilitarians and India 1959 · 345 citations
3450+22+44Years since publication100200300

Peers

Eric Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Anthropology 197
  • Philosophy 143
  • Sociology and Political Science 411
  • Archeology 9
  • Political Science and International Relations 210
Replace Dietmar Rothermund with:
Dietmar Rothermund Germany
Burton Stein United States
Anand A. Yang United States
Irfan Habib India
David Washbrook United Kingdom
Robert Eric Frykenberg United States
Lionel Rothkrug
L. H. Gann United States
Sumit Guha India
Ainslie Thomas Embree United States
Eric Stokes relative to Dietmar Rothermund Germany Dietmar Rothermund's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Dietmar Rothermund · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Stokes. The network helps show where Eric Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Eric Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric Stokes Line = papers co-authored together Eric Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The English Utilitarians and India
Hit paper breakdown →
1959345
2 1960159
3 197859
4 196740
5 196938
6
The peasant armed : the Indian revolt of 1857
198627
7 197322
8 196218
9 196817
10 197515
11 197512
12 198012
13 195910
14 19789
15 19788
16 19707
17 19766
18 19755
19 19765
20 19835

About Eric Stokes

Eric Stokes is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Philosophy, Soil Science and Anthropology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 838 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies (22 papers), South Asian Studies and Diaspora (7 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (6 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (5 papers), Political Theory and Influence (4 papers), African history and culture studies (4 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (2 papers) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (197 citations), Philosophy (143 citations), Sociology and Political Science (411 citations), Archeology (9 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (210 citations). Eric Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Holden Furber, B. A. Corry, Christopher J. Fuller, C. A. Bayly, J. D. Omer‐Cooper, Anthony Atmore, Robert O. Collins, Vera Anstey, Merle Lipton and Gananath Obeyesekere. Their work appears in journals such as The Historical Journal, The Economic History Review, Past & Present, The American Historical Review and Transactions of the Royal Historical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact