Eric J. Dein

487 citations
24 papers · 347 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Eric J. Dein

23 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers

Eric J. Dein
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 92
  • Rheumatology 39
  • Surgery 109
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 36
  • Oncology 46
Replace Matthias Sperl with:
Matthias Sperl Austria
N. Follak Germany
Thomas Kirchgesner Belgium
Camilla Pungetti Italy
Howard Haw-Chang Lan Taiwan
Joseph M. Bestic United States
Nir Hod Israel
Khaled I. El-Noueam Egypt
Masamori Shigematsu Japan
Benedikt Leidinger Germany
Eric J. Dein relative to Matthias Sperl Austria Matthias Sperl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Matthias Sperl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric J. Dein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric J. Dein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric J. Dein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric J. Dein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric J. Dein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric J. Dein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric J. Dein. The network helps show where Eric J. Dein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eric J. Dein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric J. Dein Line = papers co-authored together Eric J. Dein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201850
2 201449
3 201933
4 201930
5 201926
6
The Top 100 Cited Articles in Clinical Orthopedic Sports Medicine.
201526
7 201720
8 201719
9 201717
10 201716
11 201714
12 201811
13 20219
14 20187
15 20186
16 20183
17 20183
18
Cutaneous burn caused by radiofrequency ablation probe during shoulder arthroscopy.
20152
19 20162
20 20181

About Eric J. Dein

Eric J. Dein is a scholar working on Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shoulder Injury and Treatment (6 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (4 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (4 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (3 papers), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (3 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis (2 papers) and Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (92 citations), Rheumatology (39 citations), Surgery (109 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (36 citations) and Oncology (46 citations). Eric J. Dein has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Edward G. McFarland, Gazi Huri, Lew C. Schon, John C. Gordon, Homa Timlin, Johnathan A. Bernard, César de César Netto, Clifton O. Bingham, Ami A. Shah and Laura C. Cappelli. Their work appears in journals such as Foot and Ankle Surgery, Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, Foot & Ankle International, The American Journal of Sports Medicine and The American Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact