Eon Kim

17 papers receiving 211 citations

Peers

Eon Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Ophthalmology 35
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 66
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 72
  • Epidemiology 70
  • Pharmaceutical Science 12
Replace Emmanuel Kobia‐Acquah with:
Emmanuel Kobia‐Acquah Ireland
Sandra Franco Portugal
María Serramito Spain
Ka Yin Chan Hong Kong
Aline Lütz de Araújo Brazil
Ching‐Yu Cheng Singapore
Paramdeep Bilkhu United Kingdom
Priyanka Kammari India
Melissa W. Chun United States
Daniel Brazeau Canada
Eon Kim relative to Emmanuel Kobia‐Acquah Ireland Emmanuel Kobia‐Acquah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Emmanuel Kobia‐Acquah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eon Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eon Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eon Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eon Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eon Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eon Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eon Kim. The network helps show where Eon Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Eon Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eon Kim Line = papers co-authored together Eon Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201761
2 201648
3 202132
4 201522
5 201114
6 201210
7 20199
8 20126
9 20235
10 20094
11 20083
12 20242
13 20242
14
Refractive index of soft contact lens materials measured in packaging solution and standard phosphate buffered saline
20171
15 20241
16
Correlation between the changes in corneal power and visual outcome following inlay implantation
20131
17 20221
18 20250
19 20250

About Eon Kim

Eon Kim is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 19 papers that have together received 222 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (2 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (2 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (2 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (35 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (66 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (72 citations), Epidemiology (70 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (12 citations). Eon Kim has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Ehrmann, Ravi C. Bakaraju, Jason Barr, Jeffrey P. Cohen, Stephen Uhlhorn, Jean–Marie Parel, David Borja, Réka Solymosi, Jukka Moilanen and Kate Bowers. Their work appears in journals such as Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, Clinical and Experimental Optometry, Journal of Biomedical Optics and Journal of Criminal Justice Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact