Enea Cippitelli

1.1k citations
16 papers · 696 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Enea Cippitelli

16 papers receiving 677 citations

Peers

Enea Cippitelli
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 461
  • Human-Computer Interaction 91
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 54
  • Biomedical Engineering 403
  • Artificial Intelligence 115
Replace Giovanni Diraco with:
Giovanni Diraco Italy
Rumen Hristov United States
Chen-Yu Hsu United States
Surapa Thiemjarus Thailand
Aman Shrestha United Kingdom
Alberto Brunete Spain
Kerem Altun Türkiye
Kai-Chun Liu Taiwan
Yacine Amirat France
Pierre Barralon France
Enea Cippitelli relative to Giovanni Diraco Italy Giovanni Diraco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Giovanni Diraco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Enea Cippitelli

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Enea Cippitelli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Enea Cippitelli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Enea Cippitelli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Enea Cippitelli

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Enea Cippitelli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Enea Cippitelli. The network helps show where Enea Cippitelli may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Enea Cippitelli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Enea Cippitelli Line = papers co-authored together Enea Cippitelli links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2017158
2 2016149
3 2014134
4 201754
5 201543
6 201738
7 201735
8 201521
9 201619
10 20169
11 20159
12 20168
13 20157
14 20157
15 20143
16 20142

About Enea Cippitelli

Enea Cippitelli is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Biomedical Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Surgery, having authored 16 papers that have together received 696 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (9 papers), Gait Recognition and Analysis (8 papers), Human Pose and Action Recognition (6 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (5 papers), Hand Gesture Recognition Systems (3 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (2 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (2 papers) and IoT-based Smart Home Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (461 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (91 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (54 citations), Biomedical Engineering (403 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (115 citations). Enea Cippitelli has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Ennio Gambi, Susanna Spinsante, Samuele Gasparrini, Francesco Fioranelli, Aman Shrestha, Julien Le Kernec, Francisco Flórez‐Revuelta, Matteo Pepa, Haobo Li and Hadi Heidari. Their work appears in journals such as Sensors, IEEE Sensors Journal, Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact