Emma Sokell

1.4k citations
85 papers · 1.0k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Sokell

81 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Emma Sokell
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 913
  • Mechanics of Materials 570
  • Radiation 194
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 185
  • Spectroscopy 154
Replace J. M. Pomeroy with:
J. M. Pomeroy United States
A. S. Shlyaptseva United States
D. R. DeWitt Sweden
P. Jaeglé France
Á. Kövér Hungary
E. W. Magee United States
Y.-K. Kim United States
S. Kučas Lithuania
A. Carillon France
V. Decaux United States
Emma Sokell relative to J. M. Pomeroy United States J. M. Pomeroy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
J. M. Pomeroy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Sokell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Sokell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Sokell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Sokell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Sokell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Sokell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Sokell. The network helps show where Emma Sokell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Sokell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Sokell Line = papers co-authored together Emma Sokell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015111
2 201072
3 200062
4 201244
5 200740
6
UTA versus line emission for EUVL : studies on xenon emission at the NIST EBIT
200535
7 200533
8 201126
9 201526
10 201125
11 199624
12 200023
13 199323
14 200520
15 201419
16 200019
17 201619
18 201318
19 200418
20 200016

About Emma Sokell

Emma Sokell is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials, Radiation, Spectroscopy and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (71 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (48 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (22 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (18 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (16 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (13 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (11 papers) and Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (913 citations), Mechanics of Materials (570 citations), Radiation (194 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (185 citations) and Spectroscopy (154 citations). Emma Sokell has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include G. O’Sullivan, Padraig Dunne, P. R. Hammond, A A Wills, Fergal O’Reilly, Takeshi Higashiguchi, Bowen Li, Paul Sheridan, J. White and C. Suzuki. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, Physical Review A, Applied Physics Letters and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact