Emma Kemp
Impact in
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer survivorship and care
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
Papers in
- Oncology 18
- Cancer survivorship and care 18
-
- Family Support in Illness 3
- Co-authors
- Bogda Koczwara (24 shared papers)Lisa Beatty (20 shared papers)Phyllis Butow (10 shared papers)Chris Christensen (3 shared papers)Patricia Williams (2 shared papers)Haryana M. Dhillon (1 shared paper)Anthony Maeder (2 shared papers)Joshua Trigg (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Supportive Care in Cancer (8 papers)Psycho-Oncology (5 papers)Journal of Cancer Survivorship (4 papers)BMC Cancer (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Emma Kemp
31 papers receiving 579 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Oncology 237
- Applied Psychology 35
- General Health Professions 84
- Health 23
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 54
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Kemp
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Kemp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Kemp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Kemp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Kemp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Kemp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Kemp. The network helps show where Emma Kemp may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Kemp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 143 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 6 |
About Emma Kemp
Emma Kemp is a scholar working on Oncology, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 32 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (18 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (2 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (1 paper), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper) and Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (237 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations), General Health Professions (84 citations), Health (23 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (54 citations). Emma Kemp has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Bogda Koczwara, Lisa Beatty, Phyllis Butow, Chris Christensen, Patricia Williams, Haryana M. Dhillon, Anthony Maeder, Joshua Trigg, Jane Turner and Sylvie Lambert. Their work appears in journals such as Supportive Care in Cancer, Psycho-Oncology, Journal of Cancer Survivorship, BMC Cancer and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.