Emma Chaplin

1.3k citations
37 papers · 808 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Chaplin

33 papers receiving 777 citations

Peers

Emma Chaplin
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 78
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 443
  • Neurology 169
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 23
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 5
Replace Francis‐Edouard Gravier with:
Francis‐Edouard Gravier France
Tristan Bonnevie France
Elisabetta Zampogna Italy
Clément Médrinal France
Guillaume Prieur France
Ianthe Boden Australia
Aroub Lahham Australia
Chris Garvey United States
Elaine Bevan-Smith United Kingdom
Eduardo França Brazil
Emma Chaplin relative to Francis‐Edouard Gravier France Francis‐Edouard Gravier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23×
Francis‐Edouard Gravier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Chaplin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Chaplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Chaplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Chaplin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Chaplin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Chaplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Chaplin. The network helps show where Emma Chaplin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Chaplin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Chaplin Line = papers co-authored together Emma Chaplin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014205
2 2021152
3 2017102
4 201587
5 202347
6 201226
7 202022
8 201517
9 202016
10 202015
11 202213
12 201612
13 201911
14 202010
15 201710
16 20229
17 20228
18 20227
19 20216
20 20216

About Emma Chaplin

Emma Chaplin is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 808 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (22 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (5 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (1 paper), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper) and Health and Well-being Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (78 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (443 citations), Neurology (169 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (23 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations). Emma Chaplin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sally Singh, Neil Greening, Michael Steiner, Enya Daynes, Nikki Gardiner, Theresa Harvey‐Dunstan, Johanna Williams, Emma E. Vincent, Mike Morgan and Sana Hussain. Their work appears in journals such as Chronic Respiratory Disease, BMJ Open Respiratory Research, BMJ Open, Respiratory Research and ERJ Open Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact