Emma Bäck

20 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

Emma Bäck
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Gender Studies 110
  • Linguistics and Language 26
  • Communication 29
  • Social Psychology 73
  • Sociology and Political Science 117
Replace Dries Vervecken with:
Dries Vervecken Germany
Angelica Mucchi‐Faina Italy
Nick Joyce United States
T. Andrew Caswell United States
Edwin D. Lawson United States
Teresa Labov United States
Yating Yu Hong Kong
Elaine Richardson United States
Laura L. Paterson United Kingdom
Claudia Wegener Germany
Emma Bäck relative to Dries Vervecken Germany Dries Vervecken's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Dries Vervecken · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Bäck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Bäck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Bäck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Bäck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Bäck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Bäck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Bäck. The network helps show where Emma Bäck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Bäck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Bäck Line = papers co-authored together Emma Bäck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201596
2 201825
3 201821
4 201520
5 201416
6 201315
7 201814
8 20139
9 20118
10 20098
11 20148
12 20187
13
Hen can do it : Effects of using a gender neutral pronoun in a recruitment situation
20134
14
Vem tycker om hen
20164
15
Ungas politiska deltagande. Nya former och aktivitet genom sociala medier
20153
16
Hen can do it! : Effects of using a gender-neutral pronoun in recruitment
20153
17 20252
18 20181
19 20161
20 20111

About Emma Bäck

Emma Bäck is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Gender Studies, Communication and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (5 papers), Gender Studies in Language (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers) and Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (110 citations), Linguistics and Language (26 citations), Communication (29 citations), Social Psychology (73 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (117 citations). Emma Bäck has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Marie Gustafsson Sendén, Anna Lindqvist, Hanna Bäck, Torun Lindholm, Gema García-Albacete, Henk Erik Meier, Mikael Gilljam, Sverker Sikström, Peter Esaiasson and Ola Svenson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social and Political Psychology, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Basic and Applied Social Psychology and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact