Emma Allanson

1.6k citations
40 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Allanson

38 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Emma Allanson
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 203
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 517
  • Health Information Management 31
  • General Health Professions 116
  • Clinical Psychology 82
Replace Manjit Kaur Mohi with:
Manjit Kaur Mohi India
Sujata Sharma India
Hannah Ellin Knight United Kingdom
Fleurisca J. Korteweg Netherlands
Samira M. Haddad Brazil
Ashalata A. Mallapur India
Juan Manuel Nardin Argentina
HM Salihu United States
Rejina Gurung Sweden
Geetanjali Katageri India
Emma Allanson relative to Manjit Kaur Mohi India Manjit Kaur Mohi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Manjit Kaur Mohi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Allanson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Allanson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Allanson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Allanson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Allanson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Allanson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Allanson. The network helps show where Emma Allanson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Allanson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Allanson Line = papers co-authored together Emma Allanson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015184
2 2016154
3 2017134
4 201582
5 201659
6 201657
7 201644
8 201632
9 202129
10 201529
11 201627
12 202026
13 201824
14 201623
15 201722
16 201519
17 202117
18 201716
19 202414
20 201912

About Emma Allanson

Emma Allanson is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Oncology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (7 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (4 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (2 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (203 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (517 citations), Health Information Management (31 citations), General Health Professions (116 citations) and Clinical Psychology (82 citations). Emma Allanson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Pattinson, Vicki Flenady, Jan Jaap Erwich, Özge Tunçalp, Joy Elizabeth Lawn, Matthews Mathai, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu, Kathleen Schmeler, Nathalie Roos and Patrick Aliganyira. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, BMJ Global Health and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact