Emily Orr
Impact in
- Communication top 1%
- Social Media and Politics
- Knowledge Management and Sharing
-
- Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Papers in
-
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 3
- Gambling Behavior and Treatments 2
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 1
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 3
- Digital Marketing and Social Media 2
- Digital Games and Media 1
- Co-authors
- Craig Ross (3 shared papers)Rhonda Orr (3 shared papers)Mia Sisic (2 shared papers)Aleks Milosevic (1 shared paper)G. Ron Frisch (1 shared paper)Leslie H. Lundahl (1 shared paper)David M. Ledgerwood (1 shared paper)Amanda Stillar (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Computers in Human Behavior (2 papers)Journal of Gambling Studies (2 papers)European Eating Disorders Review (1 paper)Restoration Ecology (1 paper)Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Emily Orr
12 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Emily Orr's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Communication 537
- Information Systems and Management 350
- Sociology and Political Science 1.4k
- Clinical Psychology 401
- Applied Psychology 78
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Orr
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Orr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Orr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Orr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Orr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Orr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Orr. The network helps show where Emily Orr may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Emily Orr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 1369 |
| 2 | 2009 | 250 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 74 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 12 | Emotional awareness and interpersonal dependency. | 2007 | 1 |
About Emily Orr
Emily Orr is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Communication and Ecology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (2 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (1 paper), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (537 citations), Information Systems and Management (350 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.4k citations), Clinical Psychology (401 citations) and Applied Psychology (78 citations). Emily Orr has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Craig Ross, Rhonda Orr, Mia Sisic, Aleks Milosevic, G. Ron Frisch, Leslie H. Lundahl, David M. Ledgerwood, Amanda Stillar, Katherine A. Henderson and Jennifer Scarborough. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Journal of Gambling Studies, European Eating Disorders Review, Restoration Ecology and Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.