Emily E. Schmitt

33 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

Emily E. Schmitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 54
  • Aging 9
  • Physiology 80
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 39
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 14
Replace Claudia Gebhardt with:
Claudia Gebhardt Germany
Catherine Le United States
Camila Guerra Martinez Brazil
Anna‐Maria Siegert Spain
Basilio Aristidis Kotsias Argentina
Yifan Xu China
Kevin Widjaja United States
Leonardo Maciel Brazil
Kailun Lee Australia
Emily E. Schmitt relative to Claudia Gebhardt Germany Claudia Gebhardt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Claudia Gebhardt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Schmitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Schmitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Schmitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Schmitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Schmitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Schmitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Schmitt. The network helps show where Emily E. Schmitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Schmitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily E. Schmitt Line = papers co-authored together Emily E. Schmitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201827
2 197923
3 202121
4 201320
5 201719
6 201818
7 202017
8 201416
9 201915
10 202013
11 198213
12 202111
13 201510
14 20168
15 20208
16 20237
17 20167
18 20246
19 20224
20 20224

About Emily E. Schmitt

Emily E. Schmitt is a scholar working on Physiology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cell Biology and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (7 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (7 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (4 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (4 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (3 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (3 papers), Spaceflight effects on biology (3 papers) and Dietary Effects on Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (54 citations), Aging (9 citations), Physiology (80 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (39 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (14 citations). Emily E. Schmitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Danielle R. Bruns, J. Timothy Lightfoot, Weston W. Porter, David P. Ferguson, Giuseppe Benagiano, Donald L. Wise, Rola Barhoumi, Richard P. Metz, Evan C. Johnson and Kathleen C. Woulfe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physiology, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, The FASEB Journal, American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology and Molecular Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact